Tea Party Guilty of Sedition

Let's get one thing clear here: according to the definition of sedition the Tea Parties and several spokespersons may be inciting it. But if we the people just bury our heads in the sand and let the government run all over us, like it is now doing, what will happen then? What is the cure for a runaway government in a country that is supposed to be a republic?

Sedition. Incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government.

Well, we sure do have a lot of discontented people out there, myself included. And since in this republic the power is supposed to be with the people, I see no problem with the people airing out their problems - and trying to do something about them. But many others think that this is unpatriotic and ridiculous.

According to Joe Klein of Time Magazine: "Let me be clear: dissent isn’t sedition. Questioning an administration’s policies isn’t sedition … but it is disgraceful and the precise opposite of patriotism in a democracy.”

Well, Joe, perhaps it is...in a democracy. The problem is, the United States isn't a democracy - or wasn't meant to be. And the reason for the First Amendment is so that when the people, who are supposed to have the power, are upset with the way that the government is running things, they can show their discontent without the fear of being punished by the government who is supposed to be working for them.

Check out this article about Joe Klein's statements. I'm glad that this is getting a little bit of play, anyway. Maybe more people will wake up and see what is happening to our country and how much control the government actually wants to have. 

President Making Racist Comments?

In the video featured in this article, President Obama not only asks certain races to help his party out in the 2010 elections, but also once again cites George Bush as the cause of ALL of our problems, and lists the many "fixes" that his fellow democrats have implemented. Wow, our country is in such better shape now!

Give me a break!

Daily Caller: President Obama Plays the Race Card

Jesus A Cult Leader?

It is very well possible. Let us go through the definition of "cult":

  1. a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies.   (This, of course, applies to Christianity, especially to Jesus. Christians meet on Sundays to worship their Savior, and communion and baptism are rites and ceremonies. Communion, in particular, is disturbing in that Christians are symbolically eating the flesh and drinking the blood of Jesus, all to "remember" what he did for them. Can anyone say cannibalism?)  
  2. an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, esp. as manifested by a body of admirers.    (The person here mentioned, is of course, Jesus. Veneration is a feeling of awe, respect, or reverence, which followers of Jesus not only feel, but are commanded to feel.                                                                                                                        
  3. the object of such devotion.     (Who is the object? Jesus.)
  4. a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc.   (Anyone who has ever been to church knows that it is one big community. People band together to help each other, guide each other in their walk with Jesus, and pray. There are study groups, prayer groups, and other types of activities. Through all of this, the church builds itself into a strong community where people go seeking help and guidance with their problems. All of this in the name of Jesus.)
There are other forms of the definition, too, mostly referring to cults involving members living outside of social norms. But even in that particular definition, there was one word that stood out to me: Charismatic. No one can say that Jesus wasn't charismatic. His own people chose him over a hardened criminal to be crucified; that shows a lot about how charismatic he was. And his words have held people for thousands of years, once again showing the power of those words.

For more discussion about Jesus as a cult leader, I recommend this essay:
Cult Leader Jesus

This essay gives a lot more proof positive that Jesus was a cult leader than I have, and even includes Bible passages to make the point. It should be an interesting read for anyone willing to take up the question.

I recently purchased and read the book Direct Citizen Action by James Ostrowski. This book lays out many of the foundational principles of what has happened to our country and details things that we, as regular American citizens, can do to fight the monster that has been created - in Ostrowski's words, "...win the second American Revolution without firing a shot." Ostrowski does this clearly and concisely, purposefully keeping his statements as brief as he can in order to keep the length of the book short. In this way he has maximized any activist's potential use of the book by keeping the cost of the book low; he has also held the potential reader's interest by keeping to the point.

Ostrowski begins by defining the exact nature of our government, the way our founding fathers intended it. They never intended for our government to be a democracy (majority rule); rather, they intended the American government to be a republic. Ostrowski does a wonderful job detailing the differences between the two.

Ostrowski then goes on to detail a strategy for action and explains why trying to change the current system from within the political realm won't work. There are many grassroots organizations out there trying to do just that, but Ostrowski explains why it is a particularly hard uphill battle. But he points out that any action taken will help - the entire Revolution will be hard.

Ostrowski's action plan is detailed through the rest of the book and includes items such as "vote with your feet," "vote with your dollars," and "pull your kids out of government schools." Each action item comes with a detailed description of how this will help to change the current system. He also gives small business owners ideas for how to attract patriot customers, and patriot customers the tools to find like-minded businesses to support.

This book is by no means exhaustive in its pursuit of action items, but it never was intended to be: "I hope that this book will get your own creative juices flowing. American's excel at taking the initiative and improvising." Ostrowski's concern is that the current liberty movements will lose steam because, while they are taking on the current system, they are doing it mostly through words and not action. Since everyone knows the phrase "actions speak louder than words," Ostrowski has given us some clear actions to take that will underscore the words that have been said.

Another wonderful feature of this book is the countless online resources That Ostrowski includes to help the reader on their journey of Citizen Action. I will be listing some of these resources at the end of this post.

Anyone who is serious about the cause of liberty and wants to put in place a clear plan of action should read this book. I will look forward to hearing any feedback and participating in the new action movements that spring from the ideas given by James Ostrowski.


Resources:
Political Class Dismissed 

Government Schools Are Bad for Your Kids: What You Need to Know 

The Free State Project 

The Tenth Amendment Center 

Alliance for Separation of School and State 

Mises Institute 

This is an excellent article posted on the American Thinker about how there is no difference between the Republicans and the Democrats. We've all known this for quite some time, but in "Fighting Statism" Justin Blackman goes beyond what we've all known, and seeks to determine the philosophical and strategic mistakes that have led to this problem. Kudos to Justin for helping us see part of the problem!

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/04/fighting_statism.html

Unearned Guilt Part I

What causes unearned guilt? This is a question of philosophy, though many people do not recognize it as such, just as many people do not recognize that they are carrying any unearned guilt. There are many aspects of our society that not only cause unearned guilt, but enhance and nurture it as well.

Before we go any further, let us define the term "unearned guilt" Guilt is defined as "a feeling of responsibility or remorse for some offense, crime, wrong, etc., whether real or imagined." To feel this feeling without having done anything wrong, such as the word "imagined" suggests, is unearned guilt.

So how does our society nurture unearned guilt? What are the primary sources of this guilt? First and foremost is the attitude of today's society that we are our neighbor's keeper. Altruism. The belief that if we have more than our neighbor we are morally obligated to give them a portion of what we have. The belief that if we sacrifice for those who don't have, everyone is better off. We are made to feel guilty because we have something and someone else doesn't, but if we have earned what we have, why should we feel guilty about having it? There is a huge difference between giving to someone who doesn't have as much as you because you want to, and being made to feel morally obligated to do so. This is the difference between charity and altruism. Charity does not require a sacrifice - you are giving because you can and because you want to. Altruism always requires a sacrifice - a sacrifice of time, money, or your entire being for someone or something else.

One of the greatest proponents of altruism is religion in general, but I want to talk specifically about Christianity, since it is the religion I am most familiar with.  The beginning of the Bible's quest to turn us into altruists is the Garden of Eden - the story of Adam and Eve and the forbidden fruit. Because Adam and Eve ate of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, they were banished from the paradise of the Garden and all of mankind was cursed to be born already in sin. Millions of generations of people have been born feeling no integrity and no self-worth simply from this story. But Christians have a way out: Jesus Christ. The weight of guilt, not only from the Garden, but from the inability to follow the incredible amount of laws and commandments God gave his people, should make any serious Christian run straight to the alter and beg Jesus to be his master. But that is exactly what the Christian system is designed to do. When you read page after page of completely impossible regulation on your life, your only choice in this system is to submit to a savior - the one who can save you because you can't follow the law. But this, too, comes with a price. This master expects complete obedience to his word for saving you from your impossible state, and he expects to be worshipped, at that. In this phase, there is continuing perpetual guilt - the feeling of never being good enough or of never doing enough for this master who saved you from your previous guilt. The master tells you to give and you give constantly of your time, your money, and anything else you feel is necessary to give - and this is the sacrifice. This is the slavery to your unearned guilt that is perpetuated by Christianity. Some would say that this isn't a sacrifice, that there is reward at the end of this road of sacrifice. Who says this? The master, the one who has them enslaved in their guilt. No one really knows if this reward is real or not; they rely on faith - a belief in something for which there is no sensory evidence or rational proof - and the threat of eternal pain and suffering in hell. All of the pieces are in place to keep the serious Christian in a constant state of guilt and half-hearted hope.

I am not trying to argue about the specifics of Christianity as much as I am trying to show how the religion keeps people in a constant state of guilt. Christianity pulls people into a master/slave relationship and keeps them there for years and years, unless one is able to recognize the constant guilt and the mechanism behind it, power. Anyone who is the "master of" this type of relationship has power over their "slave" by means of their guilt. There are many such relationships in our society, not just religion, and I will be exploring other such relationships in future posts.

It wasn't long ago that children were raised with the expectation that they would earn their luxuries - they did work to earn whatever money they could to buy the things they wanted, whether it was toys, candy, or other items. In this day and age, kids are having things handed to them more than ever before. Parents justify this by saying that they deserve it, they are only kids and they should have the same things that every other kid has. But this attitude by parents is creating a new generation of kids that feel that they are entitled to whatever new toy, game, or electronic device that comes along. Later in life, this entitlement mentality manifests itself in unhealthy and unrealistic attitudes, such as the idea that one is entitled to a job, to housing, to food, or whatever basic necessities one needs to get through life.
Our children are not being taught the basic concept of responsibility, but it is not solely the fault of the parent. Fault also lies with the teachers of our children, who not only take a large part of the parenting away from the actual parent, but teach our parents that the child's self-esteem and self-confidence are at issue.

In 1974, nine students were suspended from a school in Columbus, Ohio without a hearing after a fight in the school's cafeteria. This was standard procedure in the majority of our schools at the time, and since the principal witnessed the fight, there seemed to be no reason to question the suspension. But the parents took the school to court, and in a case that went all the way to the Supreme Court, it was ruled that the principal had violated the student's fourteenth amendment rights to a hearing before suspension because the school district decided to make education a right of the citizens. Because of the ruling of Goss vs. Lopez, schools not only had to madly rush to find new ways to discipline children, but they had to recognize that, because they were involved in mandatory public education, they had to treat children as if they had the same legal rights as adults. For this reason, schools began employing lawyers to make sure that anything they did would not violate the constitutional rights of students. Because of this new policy of due process in schools, teachers found their hands tied when it came to disciplining students, and bad behavior became prevalent in schools.

Desperate for a way to control the masses, parenting experts and psychologists entered the scene in the late '70s and early '80s and stated that the reason bad behavior was so prevalent was because our children had no self-esteem. A new movement was started, and included a self-esteem task force that was formed in California. Complete with the mistaken notion that self-esteem was formed by extrinsic forces, this movement involved educating parents and teachers in the art of praising children for everything they did - regardless of whether or not it was correct - in order to make them feel good. Children began receiving awards for "participation" in every area from spelling bees to soccer, all in an effort to avoid the hurt feelings of the losers. Everyone became a winner, no matter their level of commitment, or whether or not they actually tried to succeed. The phrase "good job" became universal for any work any child did, no matter how "good" it actually was.

This trend has continued for the past thirty years and has yielded even more interesting strategies to raise self-esteem. In many school systems the normal grading system that most of us grew up with has ben replaced by a system that doesn't seem to grade at all. My own daughter was graded on whether or not her work was "satisfactory" until she entered sixth grade. This was frustrating for me because I felt that I never knew how well she was acutally doing. Many teachers have eliminated the use of red ink when grading papers, since red ink is associated with failure. And teachers and administrators have seriously considered getting rid of any type of game or activity that involves winning and losing.
Because of these measures that schools and parents have taken, success and failure have become subjective values, with our children feeling good about their work no matter how good or bad they actually do. This becomes a problem when our children can't do simple math but don't really worry about it because they tried.

Some experts are now seeing the effect of this thirty year long experiment and are saying that the parenting experts and psychologists had it wrong. The main problem is that once these children enter the workforce, success and failure become objective values rather than subjective. These new young adults can't take criticism because they have been told that everything they do is good. They expect to be praised for everything and given rewards, such as promotions and raises, for no reason at all.
The way we can stop this trend is to understand that self-esteem isn't built extrinsically, but intrinsically. The current philosophy builds a false feeling of accomplishment based on the praise received from other people. The philosophy of building self-esteem intrinsically requires that a person put forth the effort to do the best they can so that they can feel a real sense of accomplishment, a feeling that comes from within themselves.